fb

FREE shipping on all subscriptions

Trails + Technology: What Texas State Parks Teaches Us About Building Parks That Work for Everyone. – Park Recreation Magazine See link below to full article

Public works

Nishan Joshi

Parks are getting busier, expectations are higher, and “access” now means more than just opening the gate. A recent Parks & Recreation feature on Texas State Parks makes a simple point that applies to every city, HOA, and park district:

The future of access isn’t “trails or technology.” It’s both. Parks Recreation Magazine Park Recreation Magazine

Texas is a useful case study because the scale is real: the article notes Texas has more than 30 million residents and as many as 10 million visitors a year, while less than 5% of the state is public land—so the pressure on public outdoor spaces is intense. 

If you manage parks, trails, or common areas, here’s what to steal from their playbook—and how “operations basics” like dog-waste infrastructure fit directly into inclusive access.

1) Accessible design is also maintenance design

Texas emphasizes upgrading and building trails with thoughtful routing, durable surfaces suited to local ecology, and integrated “nodes” like viewpoints and rest areas. The article also calls out an operational win: smarter trail improvements can reduce erosion and prevent unintended side trails—which reduces recurring repair work and resource drain. 

That’s a key mindset shift:

  • Accessibility isn’t only a compliance line item.
  • It’s a way to stabilize the asset and reduce “death by a thousand fixes.”

And once you see it that way, the same logic applies to the most complained-about day-to-day issue in parks: waste + cleanliness + visitor experience.

2) Tech expands access when the landscape can’t be changed

Some sites simply can’t support a fully accessible trail without damaging what makes them special. The Texas example in the article highlights Government Canyon State Natural Area and its rugged terrain—where adaptive tech becomes the unlock. Parks Recreation Magazine Febru…

The article describes Texas building a statewide network of adaptive equipment (it mentions 60+ devices positioned across the state), including items like motorized track chairs and other specialized mobility devices that can handle outdoor terrain. 

This aligns with broader federal guidance on accessible outdoor recreation design (trail/facility standards) from the U.S. Access Board. And it aligns with ADA guidance around “other power-driven mobility devices” (OPDMDs) and how public entities should think about allowing them. 

Texas also publicly documents its adaptive device options (e.g., assistive/all-terrain chairs and track chairs) across parks. 

3) The operational lesson: “Choose both” applies to cleanliness, too

The article’s closing call to action is essentially: invest in both, plan for both, build for both

For park operations, that means pairing:

A) The physical system

  • durable trails
  • clear wayfinding
  • well-placed amenities (rest points, water, shade)

B) The “operating system”

  • maintenance routines
  • rapid response workflows
  • smart placement based on real use patterns
  • tools that prevent small issues from becoming public complaints

Dog waste management sits inside (B). And if you want fewer complaints, it has to be treated like infrastructure—not an afterthought.

4) Where Ruff Ruff Poop Bags fits: access includes confidence

When visitors bring kids, strollers, older family members, or mobility devices, they’re already navigating complexity. The last thing they want is uncertainty:

  • “Will the commercial dog waste station be empty?”
  • “Will the commercial dog waste dispenser be broken?”
  • “Will this trail feel neglected?”

A stocked, durable dog-waste station is small on paper—but it’s one of the highest-signal indicators of whether a park is being actively managed.

Practical “Trails + Technology” upgrades you can implement immediately

  1. Place stations like wayfinding, not like decoration
    • trailheads, parking exits, decision points, and mid-route intervals that match real walking loops
  2. Reduce the failure modes
    • dispensers that survive sun, salt air, and abuse
  3. Add simple technology that helps crews
    • QR code on the station for “Report empty / Report damage” (routes to an internal email/form)
    • a consistent inspection cadence tied to high-use days
  4. Make it inclusive by default
    • stations placed so they don’t block access routes and are reachable from firm surfaces (think strollers, wheelchairs, adaptive devices)

This isn’t “fancy.” It’s how you prevent the same small issue from generating repeated complaints.

5) A short checklist park teams can use this month

If you’re responsible for trails + parks operations, run this quick audit:

  • Do we have any high-use routes where waste stations are consistently empty?
  • Are our stations placed where people actually start walking (not where it looks nice on a map)?
  • Do we have a “reporting path” that doesn’t require a phone call?
  • Are we pairing accessibility improvements with ongoing maintenance planning (not treating them separately)?

Texas’ approach shows that expanding access is a system: design + equipment + operations

Conclusion: Build parks that more people can use—and that crews can actually maintain

The big takeaway from Texas isn’t just “add adaptive devices.” It’s the operating philosophy:

  • Trails matter.
  • Technology matters.
  • Operations ties it together. Parks Recreation Magazine Febru…

When the basics are reliable—clean routes, durable infrastructure, stocked stations—parks become easier to enjoy, easier to maintain, and easier to defend when budgets get tight.

Please refer to Parks and Recreation Magazine for the full article.

If your Park is doing something innovative please DM us and we can share. Passing along valuable information to other Parks and Public Works is a win-win for everybody.